phone 07881 511 200
Shopping cart
0
July 7, 2022

Call it by its proper name!

I am constantly left feeling very frustrated at the lack of clarity when I read about domestic homicides in the media. When I read such articles/stories,  I know even before the media say it, that it was the woman’s ex-partner.  How do I know that?  Because I read articles like this every day.

To those of us that work in the field of domestic abuse and violence, we can read between the lines of these articles and know that these are yet more women and children that have lost their lives to violent and abusive partners and ex partners.  But it is not us that need to know!  It is the general public – and the media generally do a poor job of cultivating an understanding of domestic abuse and violence among the public.

The media calls such an incident a ‘murder’ or a ‘fatal assault’ or ‘stabbing ‘– alongside suitable adjectives such as ‘horror’ or ‘sick’ and the like and without any reference to the context.  If the perpetrator is not found immediately the public may be exhorted to look out for – and avoid – a man who is armed and dangerous.

‘Murder’ of course could equally well refer to a terrorist incident, the result of an armed break-in or a contract killing.

All the while, the main reason for, the main cause of, these particular tragedies is wholly ignored.

I work at The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) and at NCDV, our mission is to make domestic abuse and violence socially unacceptable.  But, how can we begin to do that when it could be argued that the way in which the media represents domestic abuse constitutes a patriarchal ideology, which skews the issue of domestic abuse and the underlying societal norms that this creates.

Why are the words ‘domestic abuse’ not used in the media when reporting on women and children that are murdered by ex-partners?

Surely, to truly raise awareness of male violence against women, it needs to be named.  To most of the population, domestic abuse is still something that happens to other people, never to them or to their families or friends, so they don’t need to think about it!  If the media were to include these two words in their articles about women that have been murdered by their partners and/or their ex-partners, the general public would be reading these words on average twice a week as we know that on average 2 women a week are killed in the UK by their partners or former partners, although this figure has been higher during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns.

Of course, this is not just a problem in the UK.  Domestic abuse is reported in very different ways in many other countries.  ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) have very good editorial guidance around the ‘do’s and don’ts’ when reporting on domestic abuse – https://edpols.abc.net.au/guidance/domestic-violence/ – such as…

  • Name it! Use clear language that names the abuse for what it is.
  • Use active language that doesn’t reduce the severity of the offence – for instance, ‘man assaults wife’ instead of ‘woman assaulted’.
  • Include support details at the end of every story where practicable.

The media can play a vital role in the prevention of men’s violence against women, but not without paying particular attention to the way in which it represents the issue.  Domestic abuse is not a random, isolated act of violence or abuse.  It is a misuse of power and a pattern of abusive and controlling behavior, and the failure to frame an incident of domestic abuse as the systemic issue that it is, can lead to the seriousness of the issue being distorted and watered down.  Journalists and editors need to be more aware of the complexities surrounding domestic abuse and work to provide more context on what is not an isolated act of violence but a systemic failing of our society.

Domestic murder or domestic homicide are the correct characterisations for these sad events.  I would go so far as to say that if we cannot categorise something, we cannot name it.  If we cannot name it, we cannot deal with it appropriately or, in other words, accord it the social priority, effort and funding that it merits.

Domestic abuse and actual domestic violence have been with us for countless millennia but finally, perhaps, we have a chance to stop this blight on our civilisation by calling it out by its proper name.

  • I first met Sharon back in 2000 when I went into a refuge she worked in after fleeing a violent relationship. I had two babies and virtually just a bag of clothes and a few toys with us. She helped me with appointments with the police, solicitors and..

    A survivor of domestic abuse.
  • I was fortunate enough to meet and work with Sharon when she was the Advocacy Manager at Woman’s Trust and I was working for Westminster City Council. During this time Sharon developed and managed the Independent Domestic Violence Advocacy Service..

    Ainslie O’Connor – Principal Advisor for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet – Adelaide, Australia.
  • Thank you so much for all the support you have given me. You really have been amazing, and to be honest, I wouldn’t have been able to cope with Child Protection without you. The amount of strength you have given me is totally priceless, even with..

    A survivor of domestic abuse.
  • I knew Sharon as a work colleague over ten years ago. At the time, she was supporting vulnerable people, some of them were homeless due to domestic abuse and substance misuse. For me, assisting such people was what anyone in her role would be expect..

    Ted Chanza, Head of Market Operations, Airtel Malawi Ltd, Lilongwe, Malawi, Africa.
  • I have known Sharon for 6 years and have had the pleasure of working alongside her when I chaired the Westminster MARAC. Sharon is a committed, empathetic supporter of women who are or have experienced domestic abuse. She regularly goes the extra m..

    Former Chair of The Westminster MARAC.
  • I was fortunate to have had Sharon as my support worker after 17 years of domestic violence and 4 children that had witnessed and gone through it with me. I was finally strong enough to stand up and protect myself and my children. Without Sharon’s ..

    A survivor of domestic violence.
  • Without the support and constant reassurance of Sharon, I know for a fact that I wouldn’t be where I am today. I am forever grateful to her. She is extremely dedicated and knowledgeable, having her on my side when dealing with someone as persistent..

    Anonymous survivor of Domestic Abuse.
Read All